Deep taxonomies break automated classification
Models mapping products into a taxonomy thousands of nodes deep stall on ambiguous items, and an accuracy target means nothing until the error standard is defined.
Product tagging, visual search, and recommendation evals – data operations that keep pace with a catalog that never stops changing.
Talk to usThe conditions that separate a durable data operation from a one-off labeling project.
Models mapping products into a taxonomy thousands of nodes deep stall on ambiguous items, and an accuracy target means nothing until the error standard is defined.
Clicks are biased by position and presentation, and an LLM judge drifts with its prompt and model version. Both need a stable standard to measure against.
A shopping assistant can retrieve the right products and still misstate a material, a dimension, or a constraint the shopper gave. Those failures only surface when the conversation itself is graded.
Extract attributes, map taxonomies, and match duplicates across large catalogs.
Measure ranking quality with human judgments across queries and locales.
Label imagery for visual discovery, shelf audits, and planogram analysis.
Evaluate recommendations and shopping assistants against clear rubrics.
Enrichment feeds search; judgments measure it; the misses set the next batch.
Your category tree, attribute schema, and relevance rubric encoded into guidelines trained specialists apply consistently.
A pilot batch measured on inter-rater agreement per attribute and query class. Rubric ambiguities are fixed before volume.
Catalog enrichment and relevance judgments ship on cadence – with capacity that flexes for launches and peak season.
Relevance evals score each ranking release. Losing query classes define the next judgment batch.
Ranking experiments start from defensible relevance data, with the evaluation sets already built.
Start with one query classPlatform, experts, and workflows – unified in one secure infrastructure.